Tantan

Having difficulties with accepting theses which cannot be proved. And this is a real problem, for there are many sciences with unprovable theses, but therefore they are theses. And exactly those sciences which are not as abstract as mathematics, like archeology or even psychology have to work with theories which are suppositions until somebody else comes with an anti-thesis. Even if I don't believe in all the things the established archeologistst are bringing, that doesn't mean that I reject all the research they have done during so many years. Some things where I'm standing behind are quite useful. At least one has to have a basis. If one wants real evidences one has to travel back into time and live amongst those ancient people, but since we have no time-travel-machines that's an impossible option. So, if you only can be convinced with evidences which cannot be given -and now it has nothing to do with archeology, psychology or what science ever- and only run down with these matters instead of giving anti-theses, you'd better look for something you can be sure of.
The only thing I am sure of is that Prof. Dr. Walther Matthes didn't use a microscope.